Richard Distlerath

July 2025 - Washington Monument at Night
About the Image(s)
Thes fastest lens in my collection is the Canon FD 50mm f1.4 that was purchased in 1974. I used an adapter to mount it on the Canon R5. I used a tripod from the far side of the reflecting pool and captured this image of the Washington Monument. The aperture was set wide open at f1.4 with a shutter speed of 1/2 sec and iso 800. All focus is manual. The original is mage was captured in color and converted to B&W as the background lights were a bit distracting. Image was processed in LR using adaptive B&W and a slight bit of sharpening of the edges. The full manual camera operation slows the process down and brings back memories of the old film days.
7 comments posted
As someone who wasn't even born in 1974, I'm in awe of the awesome quality this lens achieves. There's something magical about vintage glass.   Posted: 07/09/2025 17:41:24


I personally have been dabbling in B&W for a couple of years now. My biggest issue is getting my blacks saturated. Your original image here is a bit muddy IMHO, and I really appreciate the subtle change made by Rizwan. It leaves a clear distinction between the sky and the bushes, while deepening the black. My only issue with the edit is that it makes the actual sky darker than its reflection, which of course is not realistic.
My other request is for a little more detail in the mmt itself, if it exists.
I'm sure you are aware that you could have gone for a smaller aperture if desired, and a lower ISO, by increasing your exposure time using a tripod. I assume you did use a tripod, so I mention this mostly for other participants. I share your regard for "old glass," and in this case it seems to remain quite sharp.
Lillian   Posted: 07/09/2025 20:40:18
I reprocessed the image in Nik Collection Silver Efex full spectrum and amplified the blacks. The histogram is extended to the full range in above image and image below.   Posted: 07/10/2025 03:11:06

I think this image is competitive in both Travel and Mono.
Side comment: For some reason your image is posted at over 10,000 pixels on the long side. That makes for a very low-res showing to get it under the requisite 1M, and also makes it more difficult to look at full-sized. I have to save it, then open it in another program or else scroll the entire screen to max size, to see anything but the small default version. I believe that in this forum it would display better if you saved it at the 768 pixel height before posting.
Lillian   Posted: 07/10/2025 09:05:53